Pope
Francis says he has open arms for the gay movement within Catholicism
(I love Catholics! I have many good friends in the Catholic
religion). Pope Francis says he would baptize an extra-terrestrial if
one landed on Earth.
But
what is he really doing? He is simply allying himself and the Church
with millions, or tens of millions, or hundreds of millions of gay
folks and UFO/Nephilim/extra-terrestrial believers. One day when
Satan comes to impersonate Christ’s return the Pope will have a
ready militia in the gay folks and UFO-ologists because he welcomed
them into his heart.
What
if one day he announces on YouTube or Twitter, “I realize that
there are many versions of the Trinity doctrine out there in the
denominations. But, It doesn’t really bother me. I’ll accept
anyone and any version of the Trinity. If you are a Trinitarian, but
you don’t believe in eternal generation like us Catholics, then I
hope you don’t let that come between you and me, or between your
denomination and the mother Church. Please join us in uniting
Christianity again like it was in the more glorious past. Please
worship with us at your local Catholic church. I am removing all
barriers. Come. Please come.”
What
would Seventh-day Adventists do?
Please
recall the following statement from Ellen
White.
“Through
the two great errors, the immortality of the soul and Sunday
sacredness, Satan will bring the people under his deceptions. While
the former lays the foundation of spiritualism, the latter creates
a
bond of sympathy with Rome.” Great Controversy, p. 588.
I
will skip over the first error and look at the second error of the
two. “Through the two great errors … Sunday sacredness, Satan
will bring the people under his deceptions.... the latter creates a
bond of sympathy with Rome.” So, Sunday-keeping creates a bond of
sympathy with the Church of Rome. That makes sense. How can a Sunday
going Christian protest against the Church’s change of the Sabbath
to Sunday by her own authority? As an accomplice with the Roman
Church in rejecting the fourth commandment, how can a Sunday
denomination protest anything about the Church?
Now
what about the Seventh-day Adventist church? Can the Trinitarian
Seventh-day Adventist church protest any corruption of the Catholic
Church or the Vatican or her Jesuit Order? Because really, any
doctrine held in common with the Catholic doctrine creates a bond of
sympathy with her. Via the common stance between Rome and Adventism
because of the Trinity we are bosom buddies on that one point. And,
since the Trinity is a foreign concept to the Bible’s Father and
Son Godship, we are now accomplices with Rome’s corruption of the
Bible on that error. Pope Francis even has pushed further on the
Trinity dogma since the Vatican’s last real threat—the SDA
church—has aligned with her on it.
This
is the Bible’s stance on the Divinity:
“ For
though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth,
(as there be gods many, and lords many,) But to us there
is but one God, the Father, of
whom are
all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are
all things, and we by him.” (1Cor.
8:5,6).
“To
all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to
be saints: Grace to you and
peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.” (Rom.
1:7).
“Grace
be
unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from
the Lord Jesus Christ.” (1Cor.
1:3).
“Grace
be
to you and peace from God our Father, and from
the Lord Jesus Christ.” (2Cor.
1:2).
“Grace
be
to you and peace from God the Father, and from
our Lord Jesus Christ.” (Gal.
1:3).
“Grace
be
to you, and peace, from God our Father, and from
the Lord Jesus Christ.” (Eph.
1:2).
“Grace
be
unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from
the Lord Jesus Christ.” (Php.
1:2).
“To
the saints and faithful brethren in Christ which are at Colosse:
Grace be
unto you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.”
(Col. 1:2).
“Paul,
and Silvanus, and Timotheus, unto the church of the Thessalonians
which is
in God the Father and in
the Lord Jesus Christ: Grace be
unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.”
(1Thess.
1:1).
“Grace
unto you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.”
(2Thess.
1:2).
“Unto
Timothy, my
own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and
peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.”
(1Tim.
1:2).
“To
Timothy, my
dearly beloved son: Grace, mercy, and
peace, from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Lord.”
(2Tim.
1:2).
“To
Titus, mine
own son after the common faith: Grace, mercy, and
peace, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ our Saviour.”
(Tit. 1:4).
“Grace
to you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.”
(Phm. 1:3).
Paul
introduces himself in every letter with Grace and peace from the only
two Divine personalities.
But,
what about 2 Corinthians 13:5?
“The
grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the
communion of the Holy Ghost, be
with you all. Amen.” (2Cor.
13:14).
The
verse refers to other statements from Paul.
“But
ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit
of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he
is none of his.
And
if Christ be
in you, the body is
dead because of sin; but the Spirit is
life because of righteousness.
But
if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you,
he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal
bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.” (Rom.
8:9-11).
The
Spirit is not a third person of the divine Headship. The Spirit is
both the Spirit of God and the Spirit of Christ. It begins with the
Father, is received by His Son, and then comes to Their family in
heaven and earth who are trusting in the Son.
The
Spirit is not only called the Spirit of God (as though the Spirit’s
name is the Spirit of God), but also “the Spirit
of him that raised up Jesus from the dead” (Rom. 8:11).
If
“the Spirit of God” is the Spirit’s name, then so also is “the
Spirit of Him that raised up Jesus from the dead”. But that
would be too unwieldy. All sarcasm aside, the phrases given to the
Spirit are not names, but descriptions. The Spirit is God’s Spirit.
God owns it because it comes from His mind. The Father raised Jesus
from the dead, not a third person of a Trinity. “Paul,
an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God
the Father, who raised him from the dead;)” (Gal.
1:1).
God,
in the New Testament, is always the Father, not a Trinity of Gods or
of Persons or of gods or of under gods. In Mark’s gospel Jesus
said, “But when they shall lead you, and deliver
you up, take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye
premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that
speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy
Ghost.” (Mark
13:11). And in Matthew’s gospel Jesus said, “But
when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak:
for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. For
it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit
of your Father which speaketh in you.”
(Matt. 10:19,20). And both are correct
because the two mean the same. The Holy Ghost is the Holy Spirit,
which is the Spirit of the Holy Father. Mathew and Mark say that the
Holy Ghost (or Holy Spirit) is the Spirit of our Father in heaven,
hallowed by His name.
Gabriel here
calls the Holy Ghost the power of the Most High God. “And
the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy
Ghost
shall come upon thee, and the power
of the Highest
shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be
born of thee shall be called the Son of God.”
(Luke
1:35).
So
Gabriel compares
the power from the Highest to God the Father, as he does again when
speaking of the only begotten Son from God. the Father. “He
(Jesus)
shall
be great, and shall be called the Son
of the Highest:
and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David.”
(Luke
1:32). The
Son of the Highest and the power of the Highest both speak of the
Father. It was the
Father’s power overshadowing Mary that germinated her egg. At that
point the divine Spirit of Michael was given to the corporeal human
egg. Jesus was conceived by His divine Father in heaven and His
earthly mother. His Father’s sinless Spirit dominated Mary’s
sinful, bequeathed humanity. That made the Messiah different that us,
but like all who receive His quickened Spirit. He had all of our
urges to sin, but His Father’s Spirit uniting with His Spirit kept
all of His sinful inheritance at bay. Never did He have a sinful
propensity because at every temptation from within He had the
willpower to shut them all down. And with His mercy, we can obtain
His victory. Thus He calls us brethren.Amazing thought!
God
rarely speaks. Everything He wants done goes through His beloved only
begotten Son, who then takes care of it by delegating.
“God … hath
in these last days spoken unto us by His
Son, whom He hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also He made
the worlds; who being the brightness of His glory, and the
express image of His person, and upholding all things by the word of
His power, when He had by Himself purged our sins, sat down on the
right hand of the Majesty on high.” (Heb.
1:1-3).
There
is much more to say, but I’ll leave with the following Ellen White
statements on her understanding of the Spirit of Christ:
“The Holy Spirit is the
Spirit Of Christ, which is sent to all men. To give them
sufficiency,” — {E.G. White, 14MR 84.3}
“The Lord is soon to come.
We want that complete and perfect understanding which the Lord alone
can give. It is not safe to catch.the spirit from another. We want
the Holy Spirit, which is Jesus Christ. If we commune with God, we
shall have strength and grace and efficiency.” — (Letter to
Prescott W.W. E.G. White, Lt66, April 10, 1894)
“The Protestants of the
United States will be foremost in stretching their hands across the
gulf to grasp the hand of spiritualism; they will reach over the
abyss to clasp hands with the Roman power; and under the influence of
this threefold union, this country will follow in the steps of Rome
in trampling on the rights of conscience.”
Did she ever think that her
denomination, the remnant
of Protestantism, would be
involved in reaching
over the abyss to clasp hands with the Roman power? Maybe. She said
that “they”
(a later generation) would
change our religion, that a new order of books would replace the kind
that made the original Seventh-day Adventist church what it was. And
regarding changes by a later generation, she warned us through
warning the Protestants churches, concerning
“new-modeling [remodeling] the cause”
“What was the origin of the great apostasy? How did the church
first depart from the simplicity of the gospel? By conforming to the
practices of paganism, to facilitate the acceptance of Christianity
by the heathen. The apostle Paul declared, even in his day, ‘The
mystery of iniquity doth already work.’ 2 Thessalonians 2:7. During
the lives of the apostles the church remained comparatively pure. But
‘toward the latter end of the second century most of the churches
assumed a new form; the first simplicity disappeared, and insensibly,
as the old disciples retired to their graves, their children, along
with new converts, ... came forward and new-modeled the cause.’—
Robert Robinson, Ecclesiastical Researches, ch. 6, par. 17, p. 51. To
secure converts, the exalted standard of the Christian faith was
lowered, and as the result ‘a pagan flood, flowing into the
church, carried with it its customs, practices, and idols.’—Gavazzi,
Lectures, page 278. As the Christian religion secured the
favor and support of
secular rulers, it was nominally accepted by multitudes; but while
in appearance Christians, many ‘remained in substance pagans,
especially worshiping in secret their idols.’—Ibid., page 278.
Has not the same process been repeated in nearly every church
calling itself Protestant? As the founders, those who possessed the
true spirit of reform, pass away, their descendants come forward and
‘new-model the cause.’” Great Controversy, p. 384,
385.
If the founders of the Seventh-day Adventist church could not be
allowed into their own denomination because of the new Trinity
fundamental belief that has come in, which they fought so hard
against the Sunday denominations—what does that say? In 1906 Ellen
White wrote than the truths that God had given us for the past half
century were not to be changed. Not a pin was to be stirred!! were
her words.
“I understood that some were anxious to know if Mrs. White
still held the same views that she did years ago when they
had heard her speak in the sanitarium grove, in the Tabernacle, and
at the camp meetings held in the suburbs of Battle Creek. I
assured them that the message she bears today is the same that
she has borne during the sixty years of her public ministry. She has
the same service to do for the Master that was laid
upon her in her girlhood. She receives lessons from the same
Instructor. The directions given her are, "Make known to others
what I have revealed to you. Write out the messages that I give you,
that the people may have them." This is what she has endeavored
to do." 1SM 35.2.
“We must have in readiness
the clear, straight messages that since 1846 have been coming to
God’s people. There will be those once united with us in the faith
who will search for new, strange doctrines, for something odd and
sensational to present to the people. They will bring in all
conceivable fallacies, and will present them as coming from Mrs.
White, that they may beguile souls….
Light will dawn upon the
understanding, and the Spirit will make an impression on minds, as
Bible truth is clearly and simply presented in the messages that
since 1846 God has been sending His people. These messages are to
find their place in hearts, and transformations will take
place.”—Letter 73, 1903.
“Remove not a pin or a
pillar from the foundation of our faith. Preach the truth as it has
been given by the Lord.” 14MR 311.