Immaculate Jesus
Did Jesus have an immaculate, sinless human
nature, or a sinful one? Is this a valid issue that relates to the fight of
faith? Can we use the Catholic word, immaculate, to describe Jesus? This is an
ongoing debate in our circles. Not that it is unimportant to understand it
correctly. A correct understanding of the nature of Christ is utterly essential
for having the true Jesus.
Ellen White distinguishes
between the effects upon spirituality from stories of fictional perfection, and the actual experiences of failure at temptations and eventual overcoming through the grace of
Christ. She intimates that the latter gives the victory to the one who is truly wrestling with God.
“The same day in the afternoon,
I was received into the church in full membership. A young woman, arrived at
the age of maturity, stood by my side and was also a candidate for admission to
the church with myself. My mind was peaceful and happy till I noticed the gold rings glittering
upon this sister’s fingers, and the large showy ear-rings
in her ears. I then observed that her bonnet was adorned
with artificial flowers and trimmed with costly ribbons, arranged in bows and
puffs. My joy was dampened by this display of vanity in one who
professed to be a follower of the meek and lowly Jesus.
“I expected that the minister would give some
whispered reproof or advice to this sister, but he was apparently regardless of
her showy apparel and no rebuke was administered. We both received the right
hand of fellowship. The hand decorated
with jewels was clasped by the representative of Christ, and both our
names were registered upon the church book.
“I can now look back upon my youthful
experience and see how near I came to making a fatal mistake. I had read many of
the religious biographies of children who had possessed numberless virtues and
lived faultless lives. I had conceived a great admiration for the paragons of
perfection there represented. But far from encouraging me in my efforts to
become a Christian, these books were as stumbling-blocks to my feet. I
despaired of ever attaining to the perfection of the youthful characters in
those stories who lived the lives of saints and were free from all the doubts,
and sins, and weaknesses under which I staggered.
“Their faultless
lives were followed by a premature but happy
death, and the biographers tacitly intimated that they were too pure and good for
earth, therefore, God in his divine pity had removed them from its
uncongenial atmosphere. The similarity of these avowedly true
histories seemed to point the fact to my youthful mind, that they
really presented a correct picture of a child’s Christian life.
“I repeated to myself again and again, ‘If that is true, I
can never be a Christian. I can never hope to be like those children,’
and was driven by this thought to discouragement and
almost to despair. But when I learned that I could come to Jesus just as
I was, that the Savior had come
to ransom just such unworthy sinners, then light broke upon my darkness, and I
could claim the promises of God.
“Later experience has convinced me that these
biographies of immaculate
children mislead the youth. They extol the amiable qualities of their
characters, and suppress their faults and failures. If they were represented as
struggling with
temptations, occasionally
vanquished, yet triumphing
over their trials in the end, if they were represented as subject to human
frailties, and beset by ordinary
temptations, then children would see that they had experienced like trials with
themselves, yet had conquered
through the grace of God. Such examples would give them fresh courage
to renew their efforts to serve the Lord, hoping to triumph as those before
them had done.
“But the sober realities and errors of the
young Christian’s life were vigorously kept out of sight, while the virtues
were so exaggerated as to lift them from above the common level of ordinary
children, who naturally despair of ever reaching such excellence and therefore
give up the effort, in many cases, and gradually sink into a state of
indifference. Life Sketches (1888) p. 146,147.
Mrs. White learned that an immaculate human demonstration of infinitely perfect righteousness causes despair in the struggling saint. But, she never condoned the opposite extreme where no standards of righteousness permitted the
girl to be received into church fellowship while wearing carnal, vain jewelry
and fashion. She took hope in Jesus’ ransoming unworthy sinners, but she never
expected Jesus to accept her sins or let her disdain the biblical standard of 1 Peter 3:3, 4.
What does this account say about
a Saviour, “who did no sin, neither was guile found in His mouth”? (1 Pet.
2:22). It says that humans can discourage, but Jesus is different. As the Son of God, He can show us perfect holiness and not discourage the helpless sinner who looks to Him for supernatural virtue. It also says that divine grace never lowers the standard of righteousness. Rather,
grace raises the standard. Jesus did no sin. And as gracious as He was, He
never gave license to disobedience, nor did He ever allow Himself to come
short of the mark of His Father’s high calling of Him.
“Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin.” (Heb. 12:4). To the point of bleeding Jesus resisted Satan’s pushing of sin upon Him. Because of His Father’s presence, He had never had the slightest inclination to sin against His Father, and He wasn’t going to start in Gethsemane when His Father went away. Does the writer of Hebrews sound like Jesus was the same as we are? Compared to us, His righteousness was like the great Mount Everest and His judgment like the deep Marianas Trench. All we can do is stand in awe of Him and tremble. We certainly must fear to tread on the holy ground of His human nature.
“And ye know that He was
manifested to take away our sins; and in Him is no sin.” (1Jn 3:5).
In Jesus’ heart and mind there was no sin.
“Whosoever abideth in Him
sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him…. Whosoever
is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he
cannot sin, because he is born of God.” (1Jn. 3:6,9).
And, He will give us His power to overcome
our sins so that we cannot sin. Here lies the crux of the whole matter. Those who will not believe that Jesus can save them from a sinful nature, will likewise not believe that Jesus could be without a sinful nature. Like the Greek philosophers, they cannot reconcile a sinless nature with flesh.
“If we confess our sins, He is
faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness….
My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any
man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous: and
He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the
sins of the whole world.” (1Jn. 1:9;2:1,2).
Jesus was righteous, the only righteous, the
only good. Only infinite perfection could propitiate the Father.
“If ye keep My commandments, ye
shall abide in My love; even as I have kept My Father’s commandments, and abide
in His love.” (John 15:10).
Jesus kept His Father’s commandments.
“For He hath made Him to be sin
for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in
Him.” (1Cor. 5:21).
Jesus knew no sin. That’s how, if we come
to Him, He can make us the righteousness of God.
“Hereafter I will not talk much
with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in Me.” (John
14:30).
Satan could find nothing in Jesus to tempt.
“For such an High Priest became
us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher
than the heavens.” (Heb. 7:26).
Jesus’ human nature was undefiled, separate
from sinners. Yet, He gladly joined with sinners to uplift them from ruin,
despite the grating their sinfulness did to His sin-free soul.
“And the angel answered and said
unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest
shall overshadow thee: therefore also that Holy Thing which shall be born of
thee shall be called the Son of God.” (Luke 1:35).
Jesus was holy from the moment Mary’s egg was divinely germinated.
“For My thoughts are not your
thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are
higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts
than your thoughts.” (Isa. 55:8,9).
Did anything change between Jesus, the Lord God
of Israel and Jesus, Lord and Master of the church? No, He is the same
yesterday, today, and forever. His ways and thoughts were not our thoughts and
ways, but were higher as the stars are high above the earth.
“For Thou wilt not leave my soul
in hell; neither wilt Thou suffer Thine Holy One to see corruption.” (Ps.
16:10).
Jesus was holy, holier than the angels, and crowned with glory and honor.
“Thou lovest righteousness, and
hatest wickedness: therefore God, Thy God, hath anointed Thee with the oil of
gladness above Thy fellows.” (Ps. 45:7).
It was perfect righteousness that made Jesus
happy.
“For He shall grow up before Him
as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: He hath no form nor
comeliness; and when we shall see Him, there is no beauty that we should desire
Him.” (Isa. 53:2).
His perfection exposed the true degradation
of the religious people and made them hate Him.
“Therefore will I divide Him a
portion with the great, and He shall divide the spoil with the strong; because
He hath poured out His soul unto death: and He was numbered with the
transgressors; and He bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the
transgressors.” (Isa. 53:12).
Jesus was numbered with the transgressors,
not as a transgressor.
The issue at stake in the
immaculate, sinless human nature of Christ is not that it sounds like Catholic
doctrine. It doesn’t matter what Catholicism says, because Catholicism is
pagan and anathema maranatha. Therefore, Catholicism should have no weight in determining
biblical Adventist doctrine. Immaculate Mary means nothing to us because she
wasn’t the mother of Jesus, but, rather the mother of Tammuz. To cover up
her vilest immorality and incest, Satan made Semiramis, AKA Isis, Ishtar,
Easter, Eastern Star, Ashtoreth, Ashtaroth, Ashera, Diana, Venus, and Mary, into the
purest star of all the pure heavens, the Queen of heaven. She says, “I sit a
queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.” (Rev. 18:7).
But, her sins have reached unto
heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. Reward her even as she rewarded
you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she
hath filled fill to her double. How much she hath glorified herself, and lived
deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her. Therefore shall her plagues
come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly
burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.
Thus, Mary of Catholicism ranks
up there in blasphemy with their Jesus who would burn sinners for ever and ever. What does any of this have to do with the true
Jesus of scripture? Nothing.
The true Jesus was truly immaculate; He had a sinless nature. And He was
the only human who was ever immaculate, according to scripture. The biblical
Mary was influenced by her sons to stop the work of Jesus. Her mistake could
only have been insinuated by the devil. Mary and Joseph scolded Jesus instead of
taking responsibility for failing to protect their holy 12-year-old from King Herod.
Mary was not immaculate or holy, neither prior to Jesus’ birth, nor ever
afterward. Mary was a good, loving, godly mother who was privileged to bring
the Messiah into the world, and He was a devoted son to her. But, He let her
know that she would not control Him once He began His ministry, and she wisely
and lovingly submitted (John 2:4). He also stanched the tradition of men to reverence and
worship Joseph’s wife just because she was the mother of the Messiah (Luke 11:27). She was happy to be just a
devoted supporter and follower of her Saviour (Acts 1:14). But, He was the only one ever
sinless, with a sinless human nature. He alone was and is immaculate, and the only One immaculate, beside His Father.
“For we have not an High Priest
which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all
points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.” (Heb. 4:15).
What could be so consoling to
sinners by believing that Jesus had a sinful nature? Is it that He can be one of the
guys? One of the girls? Would it allow that boys will be boys, and that girls
can have a girls’ night out at the club without a twinge of conscience? Does
that agree with Ellen White’s disturbed heart at her baptism, noted above? No,
it doesn’t agree at all.
So, where is the consolation if
Jesus had a sinful nature? Even Ellen White said that Bible
characters’ faultiness gives the Christian encouragement, and that the picture
perfect fictional heroes were a stumblingblock. True, we can have courage when
we see others like us stumble and fall under temptation, but overcome in the
end. They needed a Savior like I do.
But, if Jesus were tainted with
sin and struggled with sin, then who would He have for an intercessor, since He, the
Intercessor, could not stand before a holy God? What kind of a Saviour could He
be? Could He be a faithful High Priest? How could I trust Him to stand for me
before the infinite Judge of all and not get blown away with a fury greater
than He (John 14:28)? Jesus had to be infallible, immutable, untouchable by sin, and
remain so distant from Satan that his temptations could not even find a pinky hold.
Jesus not only spoke the truth, He was the
truth. And He could even be a faithful friend of sinners.
If we are genuinely being drawn
by the Father who hands us over to the Saviour, then righteousness will be in
the process of being written in our heart; godliness and holiness will be our
main concern. Victory over the sins that are besetting us, destroying us and our
loved ones, will be our chief concern, not hoping in some faultiness of Jesus’. If we are hungering and thirsting for righteousness, we
will yearn to have righteousness and hunger to see it in others, especially in
our beloved Saviour. We will be bowed down because we don’t see it often enough in this
world. The true seekers for God’s acceptance and His honor will “sigh and that
cry for all the abominations that be done in the midst thereof.” (Eze. 9:4).
They will not be looking for a doctrinal loophole for their continuing in our
sins. God’s honor, evidence of obedience to Him, will be uppermost in those who
get sealed in the end.
“All that the Father giveth Me
shall come to Me; and him that cometh to Me I will in no wise cast out.” (John
6:37). Only those that Jesus will not cast away are those children whom God, through His Law, is handing over to Jesus. Each child of God is full of guilt and
shame, as “a brand plucked out of the fire.” (Zech. 3:2). God is our
schoolmaster, and the Law of God is the strong voice of God to the conscience. His Law is His tool to humble
us and prepare us to need in His Son a saviour from sin. It is the Spirit of
truth, working His Law against our sinful unbelief and leaning on our conscience. The Law of God inspires hope and faith in a
Saviour, which brings us “unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.”
(Gal. 3:24). “For whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son
whom He receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons;
for what son is he whom the Father chasteneth not?” (Heb. 12:6,7).
What are the ramifications of
the alternative? What does this say about those who need a lower standard in
their Saviour? It says that they have not wrestled with the convictions of the
Holy Spirit of God in His Law. They have never known surrender to the humbling
of the Spirit of truth, “whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth Him
not, neither knoweth Him.” (John 14:17). To need a Jesus with a sinful nature
means such a soul is not converted. Such a one is none of His, the Anointed
One. Yes, He was “one like the Son of man.” (Dan. 7:13). But, He was still the
Most Holy Messiah the Prince to whom was given “dominion, and glory, and a
kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve Him: His
dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and His kingdom
that which shall not be destroyed.” (Vs. 14).
The Son of Man is the same Jesus who left His precious 500 disciples to receive His kingdom after the close of the investigative judgment by the Ancient of days. Can anyone actually believe that “this same Jesus, which is taken up from [the disciples] into heaven” (Acts 1:11) could establish the eternal kingdom while embodying even the slightest taint of Satan’s previous, corrupted kingdom of rebellion? Would the Ancient of days ever permit that? “Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus; who was faithful to Him that appointed Him…. For this Man was counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as He who hath builded the house hath more honour than the house.” (Heb. 3:1-3). Consider Him who was holier than Moses and the holy brethren of the apostolic church. Here was One greater than Moses. Even the best of them and us are capable of the worst; but, Jesus would not let Himself be capable of sin. By living and breathing every word of God, He would not let the darts of the tempter get through the helmet of His salvation.
“Although in the wilderness,
[John the Baptist] was not exempt from temptation. So far as possible, he
closed every avenue by which Satan could enter, yet he was still assailed by
the tempter. But his spiritual perceptions were clear; he had developed
strength and decision of character, and through the aid of the Holy Spirit he
was able to detect Satan’s approaches, and to resist his power.” The Desire of
Ages, p. 102. Yet, there came One after John whose sandals he was not worthy to
unloose.
“When Jesus came to be baptized,
John recognized in Him a purity of
character that he had never before perceived in any man. The very atmosphere
of His presence was holy and awe-inspiring. Among the multitudes that
had gathered about him at the Jordan, John had heard dark tales of crime, and had
met souls bowed down with the burden of myriad sins; but never had he come in
contact with a human being from whom there breathed an influence
so divine. All this was in harmony with what had been revealed to John
regarding the Messiah. Yet he shrank from granting the request of Jesus. How
could he, a sinner, baptize the Sinless One?
And why should He who needed no
repentance submit to a rite that was a confession of guilt to be washed
away?” The Desire of Ages, p. 110.
“And He said unto them, Ye are
from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world. I
said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not
that I am He, ye shall die in your sins.” (John 8:23,24).
How would the Son of God have the authority
to tell anyone he would die in his sins in light of Him coming from immaculate,
sinless heaven, if the Son had a sinful nature? What hypocrisy would that be!
“And she shall bring forth a
Son, and thou shalt call His name JESUS: for He shall save His people from
their sins.” (Matt. 1:21).
And, how could He save us from our sinful natures if He
has a sinful nature?
“For it became Him, for whom are
all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to
make the Captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings. For both He
that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which cause He
is not ashamed to call them brethren.” (Heb. 2:10,11).
This isn’t saying that we are
united to Christ because we and He both have sinful natures, but because His
sinless nature sanctifies our sinful nature and removes our sins from us, so
that He isn’t ashamed to call us brethren. It’s about sanctification and
receiving His sinless divine nature, not bemoaning or excusing our sinful
nature next to His sinful nature. “We’re only human!!” “Jesus was only human!!”
“Come on! Let’s be ethical and not judge Jesus (or us) too harshly!”
“Wherefore in all things it
behoved Him to be made like unto His brethren, that He might be a merciful and
faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for
the sins of the people. For in that He Himself hath suffered being tempted, He
is able to succour them that are tempted.” (Heb. 2:17,18).
The issue about
Christ’s nature is not only about His power to sanctify His people; it’s that joining Him in
His suffering under temptation strengthens us in our suffering under
temptation.
“For verily He took not on Him
the nature of angels; but He took on Him the seed of Abraham.” (Heb. 2:16). “A
body hast Thou prepared Me:… But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice
for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God.” (Heb. 10:5,12).
Jesus didn’t come in the
brilliant body of angelic spirits which excel in strength; but He had no beauty
in Him that they should desire Him. Rather, He came in a human form weakened by
4,000 years of sin’s degradation upon the human race. Yet, He offered a perfect
sacrifice because He had never been tainted by sin.
“How much more shall the blood
of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God,
purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?” (Heb. 9:14).
Without a mediator before God,
His just character necessitated sinlessness from His first moment of conception
until His death. We can be declared just through justification, which says that
we never sinned. However, Jesus’ status of never having sinned could only come
through, not as a declaration by grace, but as a reality without grace.
Otherwise, the Mediator would need a mediator before God. Who less sinful would
be that mediator, God? Never! God is the Judge deciding if His Son is worthy to
forever destroy the great controversy issues of sin and His sin spreading adversaries.
It’s a travesty, and a symptom
of apostasy and acceptance of ecumenism, to degrade the Son of God with a nature
tainted by sin. A Saviour with a sinful nature in no way inspires anyone to
have victory over sin. So, the alcoholic in the gutter hears of another sinner-Saviour who wrestled with alcoholism. Could that really help the struggling alcoholic?
Or, could the real power come from One who can be kind and loving and
understanding enough to seek the alcoholic out and then give him His all-powerful, sinless Spirit for
strength to overcome alcohol? The sinless One offers the slave of alcohol the privilege to look at Him and away from the sin that bewitches and beckons him so, telling him that he can have perfect acceptance
by God if he accepts His Son’s friendly help. Another person can help by testifying
that a sinless, powerful Saviour took away the same, or a similar, temptation by His sinless Spirit in the
inner man. But, no one is benefitted by a supposed Saviour who has lost
His perfection. We need to know that divine power can keep us from falling, and
will never miss under any circumstance.
To believe that Jesus had our
sinful nature pollutes the gospel into pure humanism. Humanism is a human
tradition that says no one can reprove me, correct me, instruct me, or offend
my conscience. It leads to unrestrained pride and perversity. It also gives the person
who never touched alcohol or a cigarette or a drug or swine an advantage over a
Jesus who is tempted with those things. It makes the person, who believes
himself to have never done anything wrong, better than a Jesus who struggles with sodomy. Jesus can never
convict that self-righteous person, and that is exactly what those who hold this sinful Jesus
doctrine desire. The true Jesus caused a constant grating on the conscience of the
humanistic religious leaders of the babylonized religion of Judaism. They would
have loved to see some character flaw in Him. But, His challenge to them was,
“Because I tell you the truth, ye believe Me not. Which of you convinceth Me of
sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe Me?” (John 8:45,46). They could see nothing that even
hinted of sin. So, their only reply was to cast Him off as devil-possessed.
“Say we not well that Thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?” (John 8:48).
Jesus was not just like us. And
how we should be abounding with joy that He isn’t like we are! How unfaithful and unloving
sin makes us! How self-centered! Who could trust a Saviour like us? “And so
it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was
made a quickening Spirit.” (1Cor. 15:45). Jesus was more than Adam before his
fall into sin. But, it should be enough to know that the Son of God accepts me
and loves me, can forgive my sins and make me whole. I can’t think of any better news.
“Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin.” (Heb. 12:4). To the point of bleeding Jesus resisted Satan’s pushing of sin upon Him. Because of His Father’s presence, He had never had the slightest inclination to sin against His Father, and He wasn’t going to start in Gethsemane when His Father went away. Does the writer of Hebrews sound like Jesus was the same as we are? Compared to us, His righteousness was like the great Mount Everest and His judgment like the deep Marianas Trench. All we can do is stand in awe of Him and tremble. We certainly must fear to tread on the holy ground of His human nature.
The Son of Man is the same Jesus who left His precious 500 disciples to receive His kingdom after the close of the investigative judgment by the Ancient of days. Can anyone actually believe that “this same Jesus, which is taken up from [the disciples] into heaven” (Acts 1:11) could establish the eternal kingdom while embodying even the slightest taint of Satan’s previous, corrupted kingdom of rebellion? Would the Ancient of days ever permit that? “Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus; who was faithful to Him that appointed Him…. For this Man was counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as He who hath builded the house hath more honour than the house.” (Heb. 3:1-3). Consider Him who was holier than Moses and the holy brethren of the apostolic church. Here was One greater than Moses. Even the best of them and us are capable of the worst; but, Jesus would not let Himself be capable of sin. By living and breathing every word of God, He would not let the darts of the tempter get through the helmet of His salvation.