The original kingdoms of love

“This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man^H120, in the likeness of God made He him; 

Male and female created He them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.” (Gen. 5:1,2).

“And God said, Let Us make man^H120 in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.” (Gen. 1:26).

H121

אָדָם

'âdâm

aw-dawm'

The same as H120; Adam, the name of the first man, also of a place in Palestine: - Adam.

H120

אָדָם

'âdâm

aw-dawm'

From H119; ruddy, that is, a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.): - X another, + hypocrite, + common sort, X low, man (mean, of low degree), person.

H127

אֲדָמָה

'ădâmâh

ad-aw-maw'

From H119; soil (from its general redness): - country, earth, ground, husband [-man] (-ry), land.

H126

אַדְמָה

'admâh

ad-maw'

Contracted for H127; earthy; Admah, a place near the Dead Sea: - Admah.

“The first man is of the earth, earthy.” (1Cor. 15:47).

Adam was the first human born from the earth, his name described his domain and his composition. The fowls were called out from the air and ruled the air of the Earth; the fish and marine mammals were called out from the waters and ruled the waters of the Earth; the land animals were called out from the ground and ruled the land of the Earth. But Michael personally molded Adam from the planet, therefore he overruled the fowls, fish, and animals, and all their domains. Eve was the mother of all living, the mother of the human race, the house band. But because she was born from Adam, Adam was sovereign over her and over the whole human race that would come out of her. As much as he loved Eve, Adam was her lord, provider, and protector; and she, while still unpoisoned by the spirit of Satan and sinless, was perfectly, joyfully content with that divinely ordained arrangement.

Michael made Adam in His Father’s image, kingly, bold, and the king of justice. Adam was father to every human being, the ultimate authority in the family on Earth. Eve was Adam’s helper-equal. She was his second self. Made in God’s image, Adam was king of justice, and his sense of justice was perfectly balanced with mercy, as needed. And made in Adam’s image, Eve was the perfection of mercy, given to Adam to ensure that his justice would remain balanced with mercy. Justice and mercy met perfectly together in them; in them righteousness and peace constantly loved to kiss each other.

From the throne of heaven the Father of all ruled over His universe. He, the self-existent One, was the source of everything and of everyone, including His only begotten Prince. His crown Prince was His Helper-Equal, who came from His Father’s bosom like Eve came from Adam’s. Named “Who is like God?”, Michael was His Father’s second self, who would faithfully ensure mercy in all the Father’s judgments and pronouncements.

This arrangement was the Father’s, and Michael was forever perfectly, joyfully happy with it. “Thou lovest righteousness, and hatest wickedness: therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.” (Psa. 45:7). And “fellows” is also translated, “joined”, “knitted together”, as in fellowship and hearts knitted together. Thus we know that  He was united with His creations based on common origin and experience. Thus, we know that the Son innately possessed a commonality with His children, as Eve would have with hers. “Fellows” also infers that the souls of Father and Son were knitted together and the same knitting together existed between Adam and Eve. All grew up in the same environment, Eve in Adam’s environment as did Michael in God’s, and in all the confines that the word, “environment”, connotes.

The equality that Eve enjoyed under Adam’s government existed because of Adam’s favor toward her. Though she was his offspring, to him she was “my sister, my love, my dove, my undefiled” (Song 5;2). Such a favor-based equality seems to create an unbreachable chasm until one realizes the amazing feats inherent in love. If sinless, disinterested, self-sacrificing love is not fathomable, then neither can be the equality between all the earthly fathers and mothers, nor can be fathomed the equality between the great Prince of heaven and His much greater King. But through infinite love the much physically inferior Son, as in “One like the Son of man” (Dan. 7:13), and His greater, much older Father, as in “the Ancient of days” whose throne was cast up “and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of His head like the pure wool: His throne was like the fiery flame, and His wheels as burning fire” (Dan. 7:9), fit a similar likeness in like Abraham to Isaac. What a vast difference in ages! One hundred years!  Like a grandfather and grandson. And God made Isaac a type of Christ. See Genesis 22:1-18; John 8:56. And Paul said that Isaac represented Christ and His children. See Galatians 3:16; 4:28. Who does that make Abraham a type of? God, the Father. Ellen White said she saw the Father and Son together, and the Son was just a little smaller than the Father. I’m sure Isaac, not fully arrived at his prime, was a little smaller than Abraham. So the figure matches well. But what about the huge difference in their ages? What does say about co-equal, co-eval Father and Son? Christ accomplishing our redemption at a young age and then returning home again as a young man to the Ancient of days who alone is described as “Him that liveth for ever and ever” (Rev. 5:14), must also assail the co-eval notion from the worldly, politicizing early Church fathers. 

In the absence of the great, equalizing love issue that exists in every healthy marriage lies the cause of the new Adventist Trinitarian quandary, which is not a quandary at all if the mind is illuminated by the gift of the divine nature from the God of love. Christ need not be co-eternal with God the Father in order to provide us strong faith in His justification, which they profess to be the cause of their demand for a co-eval Son. All that is necessary to have faith in real justification through the Son, that brings peace with God to the soul through the abiding Holy Spirit of the Son, is for the Law to be given authority and for the Son to be begotten.

Our wrestling with a Law with full authority to condemn our sins will satisfy the Schoolmaster and will allow Him to bring us to His dearly beloved begotten Son. And when we will see that the Son’s begottenness is amply provided for in the biblical anti-trinitarian Koine Greek words, uihos and prōtotokos then the Son’s begottenness will convince us of His place deep in the heart of God. But that true, biblical begetting the non-Adventist Trinity PhDs absolutely forbid upon pain of church discipline (which amounts to disfellowship from the worldwide church and the charge of “trespassing” misdemeanor if caught on church premises).

“...Thy holy child Jesus.” (Acts 4:30). When the apostles prayed to the Father by that name, they were not minimizing the greatness of the holy child Jesus, but rather remembering with the Father the victory of His beloved, obedient, really begotten child Jesus, as the spotless Lamb who was beaten and sacrificed, now ministering in their behalf and praying for their persecutions.

Were a (grand)father and (grand)son love to be allowed into the relationship of the eternal King and His dearly beloved Help-Meet, then Adventists don’t need to “new-model the cause” by bringing in the Trinitarianism from the apostate Protestant denominations. Please read the following quote from The Great Controversy, remembering that today’s dangerous threat is not the intrusion of the ancient paganism into Christianity, but rather a Vatican II ecumenizing of the pioneers’ original Advent movement into the apostate churches.

“What was the origin of the great apostasy? How did the church first depart from the simplicity of the gospel? By conforming to the practices of paganism, to facilitate the acceptance of Christianity by the heathen. The apostle Paul declared, even in his day, ‘The mystery of iniquity doth already work.” 2 Thessalonians 2:7. During the lives of the apostles the church remained comparatively pure. But ‘toward the latter end of the second century most of the churches assumed a new form; the first simplicity disappeared, and insensibly, as the old disciples retired to their graves, their children, along with new converts, ... came forward and new-modeled the cause.’— Robert Robinson, Ecclesiastical Researches, ch. 6, par. 17, p. 51. To secure converts, the exalted standard of the Christian faith was lowered, and as the result ‘a pagan flood, flowing into the church, carried with it its customs, practices, and idols.’—Gavazzi, Lectures, page 278. As the Christian religion secured the favor and support of secular rulers, it was nominally accepted by multitudes; but while in appearance Christians, many ‘remained in substance pagans, especially worshiping in secret their idols.’—Ibid., page 278.

“Has not the same process been repeated in nearly every church calling itself Protestant? As the founders, those who possessed the true spirit of reform, pass away, their descendants come forward and ‘new-model the cause.’ While blindly clinging to the creed of their fathers and refusing to accept any truth in advance of what they saw, the children of the reformers depart widely from their example of humility, self-denial, and renunciation of the world. Thus ‘the first simplicity disappears’ A worldly flood, flowing into the church, carries ‘with it its customs, practices, and idols.’” (Great Controversy, p. 384, 385).

Love and the image of the Godhead, which dwelt in the first pair and in all the marriages of the world today, solves the theological problem of the equality between the Father and the Son fabricated by AU’s Vatican seminary chiefs. We don’t need their NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM. But heaven’s self-sacrificing love Satan and his celibate priests are averse to, and so are his emotion-based and enervated, platonic Protestant agents. So, because they don’t know it (or don’t want to know it) in their emptiness they substitute for the original, primitive, beautiful holiness in the divine Father and Son embrace a blasphemous but ever so subtly homosexual threesome, deified, eternal orgy.